<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Stoke Newington Chambers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stokenewingtonchambers.co.uk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stokenewingtonchambers.co.uk</link>
	<description>Real law, for real people</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 15:09:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter Joke Trial: Why Are We Waiting?</title>
		<link>http://www.stokenewingtonchambers.co.uk/twitter-joke-trial-why-are-we-waiting/</link>
		<comments>http://www.stokenewingtonchambers.co.uk/twitter-joke-trial-why-are-we-waiting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 17:42:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[#twitterjoketrial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Chambers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[s127]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stokenewingtonchambers.co.uk/?p=1679</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Crap! Robin Hood airport is closed. You&#8217;ve got a week and a bit to get your shit together otherwise I&#8217;m blowing the airport sky high!!&#8221; While much has been written about whether the above tweet sent by Paul Chambers to his girlfriend is indeed &#8220;menacing&#8221; and therefore a breach of s127 of the Communications Act, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stokenewingtonchambers.co.uk/twitter-joke-trial-why-are-we-waiting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Written Constitutions &amp; Post Office Privatisation</title>
		<link>http://www.stokenewingtonchambers.co.uk/written-constitutions-post-office-privatisation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.stokenewingtonchambers.co.uk/written-constitutions-post-office-privatisation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 15:29:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of the United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Article 8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliamentary Supremacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privatisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Royal Mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Separation of Powers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Postal Service]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stokenewingtonchambers.co.uk/?p=1646</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Carl Gardner recently blogged about &#8220;Written constitutions, a warning from America&#8221; and noted his bemusement that the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act could be &#8220;struck down&#8221; by the Judicial Branch as being &#8220;unconstitutional&#8221; &#8211; particularly when Barack Obama had made health care reform a fundamental plank of his election manifesto. My response to Carl [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stokenewingtonchambers.co.uk/written-constitutions-post-office-privatisation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Don&#8217;t You Have a LPA?</title>
		<link>http://www.stokenewingtonchambers.co.uk/lasting-power-of-attorney/</link>
		<comments>http://www.stokenewingtonchambers.co.uk/lasting-power-of-attorney/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 16:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DIY Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LPA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stokenewingtonchambers.co.uk/?p=1613</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m not often moved to tears by a blogpost &#8211; and if you haven&#8217;t been reading Baroque in Hackney&#8217;s, &#8220;Christmas with Alzheimers&#8221; and &#8220;Alzheimer&#8217;s update: horror story de nos jours&#8221; &#8211; you&#8217;re missing out. I&#8217;m not sure if my sadness is for Ms Baroque, her aunt &#8211; or whether the prospect of my own possible [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stokenewingtonchambers.co.uk/lasting-power-of-attorney/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>50 Years of To Kill a Mockingbird</title>
		<link>http://www.stokenewingtonchambers.co.uk/50-years-of-to-kill-a-mockingbird/</link>
		<comments>http://www.stokenewingtonchambers.co.uk/50-years-of-to-kill-a-mockingbird/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 17:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellany]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stokenewingtonchambers.co.uk/?p=1592</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NEW YORK CITY [Lester Holt, NBC News]&#8211; There are some books and some movies that just stay with us because they find a way to touch us, provoke us, or give us pause. Fifty years ago the film version was released of an American literary classic that took audiences on an unforgettable journey into the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stokenewingtonchambers.co.uk/50-years-of-to-kill-a-mockingbird/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Sheriffs Are Coming</title>
		<link>http://www.stokenewingtonchambers.co.uk/the-sheriffs-are-coming/</link>
		<comments>http://www.stokenewingtonchambers.co.uk/the-sheriffs-are-coming/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 10:36:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DIY Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debt Recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Tribunal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fi Fa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HCEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sheriffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transfer up]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stokenewingtonchambers.co.uk/?p=1555</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Sheriffs Are Coming has to be my favourite programme at the moment. While every episode is the same &#8211; with Employment Tribunal and County Court money judgments finally catching up with rogue landlords and former employers &#8211; there is something quite satisfying watching people who&#8217;ve been cheated and bullied send Phil and Grant Mitchell [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stokenewingtonchambers.co.uk/the-sheriffs-are-coming/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pioneers, Stolen Lethal Injection Drugs &amp; Nebraska Attorney General Jon Bruning</title>
		<link>http://www.stokenewingtonchambers.co.uk/pioneers-stolen-lethal-injection-drugs-nebraska-attorney-general-jon-bruning/</link>
		<comments>http://www.stokenewingtonchambers.co.uk/pioneers-stolen-lethal-injection-drugs-nebraska-attorney-general-jon-bruning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 14:56:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Death Penalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clive Stafford Smith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Don Stenberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jerry Soucie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Bruning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nebraska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reprieve]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stokenewingtonchambers.co.uk/?p=1476</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m sure when Jon Bruning approved this video, he was hoping it would portray him as a real Nebraskan &#8211; one of ours &#8211; standing on the shoulders of pioneers. Instead, it reminds me of Willa Cather&#8217;s 1923 essay, &#8220;Nebraska, The End of the First Cycle&#8221;: In Nebraska, as in so many other States, we [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stokenewingtonchambers.co.uk/pioneers-stolen-lethal-injection-drugs-nebraska-attorney-general-jon-bruning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Enforcement of County Court Judgments &amp; Employment Tribunal Orders</title>
		<link>http://www.stokenewingtonchambers.co.uk/enforcement-of-county-court-judgments-employment-tribunal-orders/</link>
		<comments>http://www.stokenewingtonchambers.co.uk/enforcement-of-county-court-judgments-employment-tribunal-orders/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 16:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DIY Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debt Recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Tribunal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fi Fa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HCEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sheriffs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stokenewingtonchambers.co.uk/?p=1449</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Several litigants in person have come to me recently about enforcing their county court and tribunal money judgments. They won their cases a few years ago, but the other side haven&#8217;t paid. Is getting judgment debtors to pay what they owe normally a problem? The short answer is, &#8220;yes&#8221;. According to the Ministry of Justice&#8217;s 2009 research, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stokenewingtonchambers.co.uk/enforcement-of-county-court-judgments-employment-tribunal-orders/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How To Brief A Barrister</title>
		<link>http://www.stokenewingtonchambers.co.uk/how-to-brief-a-barrister/</link>
		<comments>http://www.stokenewingtonchambers.co.uk/how-to-brief-a-barrister/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 13:57:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advocacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DIY Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stokenewingtonchambers.co.uk/?p=1433</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ll start with how not to brief a barrister. My friend J decided to start a claim against his neighbour. He was a litigant in person &#8211;  but told me that he had a barrister &#8220;on hand&#8221; who was guiding him. J told me the barrister represented him at a pre-trial hearing, helped him write some [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stokenewingtonchambers.co.uk/how-to-brief-a-barrister/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Criminal Law Recognition Of Stalking As Gender Based Violence: At Last</title>
		<link>http://www.stokenewingtonchambers.co.uk/criminal-law-recognition-of-stalking-as-gender-based-violence-at-last/</link>
		<comments>http://www.stokenewingtonchambers.co.uk/criminal-law-recognition-of-stalking-as-gender-based-violence-at-last/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:42:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women & the Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic Violence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stalking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stokenewingtonchambers.co.uk/?p=1396</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When a friend of mine was being stalked in the late 90s, we were all in a bit of denial. Only when it finally dawned on us that the post-breakup &#8220;bump intos&#8221;, pebbles thrown against her window and countless letters and flowers had escalated to screaming threats to kill himself and 24/7 surveillance &#8211; including [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stokenewingtonchambers.co.uk/criminal-law-recognition-of-stalking-as-gender-based-violence-at-last/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Geeklawyer, Article 8 &amp; The Bar Standards Board: What The BSB Can Learn From Ken Livingstone</title>
		<link>http://www.stokenewingtonchambers.co.uk/geeklawyer-article-8-the-bar-standards-board-what-the-bsb-can-learn-from-ken-livingstone/</link>
		<comments>http://www.stokenewingtonchambers.co.uk/geeklawyer-article-8-the-bar-standards-board-what-the-bsb-can-learn-from-ken-livingstone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 17:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Article 10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Article 8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Code of Conduct]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stokenewingtonchambers.co.uk/?p=1269</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In case you haven&#8217;t read it, Charon QC kicked off an interesting discussion about the Bar Standards Board&#8217;s censure of David Harris for some things he published as @geeklawyer by way of his protected Twitter account. The BSB called it, &#8220;engaging in conduct which was likely to diminish public confidence in the legal profession, administration [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stokenewingtonchambers.co.uk/geeklawyer-article-8-the-bar-standards-board-what-the-bsb-can-learn-from-ken-livingstone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

