<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Stoke Newington Chambers &#187; Criminal law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stokenewingtonchambers.co.uk/category/criminal-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stokenewingtonchambers.co.uk</link>
	<description>Real law, for real people</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 18:18:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Cycling QC &amp; the Hounslow Killing Zone Incident</title>
		<link>http://www.stokenewingtonchambers.co.uk/the-cycling-qc-the-hounslow-killing-zone-incident/</link>
		<comments>http://www.stokenewingtonchambers.co.uk/the-cycling-qc-the-hounslow-killing-zone-incident/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 18:39:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyclists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RTA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stokenewingtonchambers.co.uk/?p=1201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems like it was just the other day we had to lay down the law for light jumping cyclists. Today, and with a big H/T to Messrs Legal Cheek, we&#8217;re able to see the flip-side of the same old coin &#8211; motorists who don&#8217;t think cyclists have equal protection under the Road Traffic Act [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stokenewingtonchambers.co.uk/the-cycling-qc-the-hounslow-killing-zone-incident/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Curious Incident of the Edgware Road Cyclist</title>
		<link>http://www.stokenewingtonchambers.co.uk/the-curious-incident-of-the-edgware-road-cyclist/</link>
		<comments>http://www.stokenewingtonchambers.co.uk/the-curious-incident-of-the-edgware-road-cyclist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 22:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyclists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RTA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stokenewingtonchambers.co.uk/?p=1142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While I make no comment on the Danny Shine and PC Stout matter, as the video has been taken down, I thought it might be a useful moment to make some general comments on cycling, red lights, police powers and the law. Running red lights is an offence. Even for cyclists &#8211; and the law [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stokenewingtonchambers.co.uk/the-curious-incident-of-the-edgware-road-cyclist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Case for a UK Bill of Rights?</title>
		<link>http://www.stokenewingtonchambers.co.uk/the-case-for-a-uk-bill-of-rights/</link>
		<comments>http://www.stokenewingtonchambers.co.uk/the-case-for-a-uk-bill-of-rights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 19:05:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Separation of Powers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stokenewingtonchambers.co.uk/?p=587</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am usually the first one to defend the UK&#8217;s unwritten Constitution. Then I read stories like the following and wonder if it really will take a single, codified document for the Executive to get the message. &#8220;Police are removing valuables from unlocked cars to shock motorists into being more careful. Officers are taking everything [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stokenewingtonchambers.co.uk/the-case-for-a-uk-bill-of-rights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>s18 OAPA, Self-Defence &amp; an Englishman&#8217;s Home</title>
		<link>http://www.stokenewingtonchambers.co.uk/s18-oapa-self-defence-an-englishmans-home/</link>
		<comments>http://www.stokenewingtonchambers.co.uk/s18-oapa-self-defence-an-englishmans-home/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 01:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Munir Hussain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[s18 OAPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self Defence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stokenewingtonchambers.co.uk/?p=457</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s hard not to feel sorry for Munir Hussain and his brother Tokeer. But put your emotions to one side and see if you can find Munir and Tokeer a defence in law. &#8220;Mr Hussain&#8217;s nightmare began on September 3 last year when he, his wife, 18-year-old daughter and two sons aged 18 and 15 [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stokenewingtonchambers.co.uk/s18-oapa-self-defence-an-englishmans-home/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The No Intent Crimes of Strict Liability and Paul Clarke</title>
		<link>http://www.stokenewingtonchambers.co.uk/the-no-intent-crimes-of-strict-liability-and-paul-clarke/</link>
		<comments>http://www.stokenewingtonchambers.co.uk/the-no-intent-crimes-of-strict-liability-and-paul-clarke/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 22:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firearms Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mens rea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Clarke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strict Liability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stokenewingtonchambers.co.uk/?p=383</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As explained in my previous post on answering problem questions, there are generally two elements to be proved in order to convict someone for the commission of a crime &#8211; the actus reus and mens rea. Criminal liability generally attaches where the Defendant has the intent to do an illegal act (mens rea) at the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stokenewingtonchambers.co.uk/the-no-intent-crimes-of-strict-liability-and-paul-clarke/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>s2 Fraud Act, Balloon Boy &amp; School Places</title>
		<link>http://www.stokenewingtonchambers.co.uk/s2-fraud-act-balloon-boy-school-places/</link>
		<comments>http://www.stokenewingtonchambers.co.uk/s2-fraud-act-balloon-boy-school-places/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 21:50:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[s2 Fraud Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[School places]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stokenewingtonchambers.co.uk/?p=312</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ever since Harrow Council dropped their s2 Fraud Act proceedings against Mrinal Patel , the Government has been looking for ways to prosecute parents who lie about their child&#8217;s address to get them into the school of their choice. Harrow&#8217;s case collapsed, I suspect, after someone had a look at Archbold and realised that the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stokenewingtonchambers.co.uk/s2-fraud-act-balloon-boy-school-places/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Balloon Boy</title>
		<link>http://www.stokenewingtonchambers.co.uk/balloon-boy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.stokenewingtonchambers.co.uk/balloon-boy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 16:24:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stokenewingtonchambers.co.uk/?p=259</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Once upon a time, there was a hypothetical dad who released a hypothetical helium balloon into the sky. Hypothetical dad rang the hypothetical authorities, claiming his one of his hypothetical sons was onboard and floating away. The hypothetical boy was later found hiding in the hypothetical dad&#8217;s garage attic. When later asked by a hypothetical [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stokenewingtonchambers.co.uk/balloon-boy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top Marks For Problem Question Answers (Part 2)</title>
		<link>http://www.stokenewingtonchambers.co.uk/top-marks-for-problem-question-answers-part-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.stokenewingtonchambers.co.uk/top-marks-for-problem-question-answers-part-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 18:46:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Problem questions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stokenewingtonchambers.co.uk/?p=189</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you remember nothing else, remember this – knowing the law isn’t enough That’s right, you can sit in lectures listening and in the library reading until the cows come home and you will still be mediocre (or fail) if you do not know how to apply the law to the facts contained in the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stokenewingtonchambers.co.uk/top-marks-for-problem-question-answers-part-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top Marks For Problem Question Answers (Part 1)</title>
		<link>http://www.stokenewingtonchambers.co.uk/top-marks-for-problem-question-answers-part-1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.stokenewingtonchambers.co.uk/top-marks-for-problem-question-answers-part-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 18:10:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Problem questions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stokenewingtonchambers.co.uk/?p=170</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[During our last tutorial, my OU students and I discussed how to maximise their marks on criminal law problem questions. There are some definite dos and don’ts – as well as a formula &#8211; for dealing with problem questions. If nobody&#8217;s ever shown you how to do it, allow me to be the first! If [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stokenewingtonchambers.co.uk/top-marks-for-problem-question-answers-part-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

